That thing is a monster. Not one for looks, but "it will penetrate two walls of any modern APC at one kilometer range"
You could shoot someone beside an APC from the other side... just imagine when all the satalite imagery and what not can be sent to soldiers and predict where people are, you could get shot while in the middle of a building... You are standing in line in the middle of some huge building complex waiting for god only knows what... and suddenly you here the sound of concrete being blown apart and boom! your brains are gone... this is with that satalite stuff by the way... which i hear is only in testing... and really i dont know that it could find you in the middle of a building unless they had some good angles or a really good heat detecting mechanism to understand who you are... ok so maybe in the middle of a huge building would save you, but soldiers couldn't hide behind walls... not even behind smaller tanks... that's just crazy... and at 15.2mm round 0_o that's bigger then the "beast" .50 cal... so now people who bust a nut at that have to realize that is just a big sniper rifle, this is a tank killer... ok so a barret could lay waste to big trucks and stuff, maybe an APC... but still this is bigger... I guess by only 1/8th of an inch or so but that is quite the differnce considering no one seems to think the .45 is all that big and yet the .50 desert eagle is huge... that's a differnce of 1/20th of an inch and the 9mm is only like a bit more then 1/8th less then a .50 too I think... or maybe I am looking at this ruler wrong...
If I had money I would commision someone to make it... but if I had money first I would have to make a G11... If I don't have one by the time I get my sign on bonus I will have enough money when I get it and get one built... although it would have to be awesome...
That sucks that they gave up on it... wouldn't be suprised if it was because that it wouldn't take an m16 mag :P (partly, i think Ozzy explained a better reason) But I just read that it was started before east and west joined, and cancelled afterwards, so it might have had something to do with NATO and their ammunition rules...
If they kept working on it, I think pretty much all guns would start to follow that trend...
"When firing the full-auto, the housing moves back and forward during each shot, resulting in moderate rate of fire of some 600 round per minute. But, when firing the three-round bursts, second and third cartridges are feed and fired as soon as the chamber is ready for it, and third bullet leaves the barrel PRIOR to the moment when the housing becomes to its rearward position. This results in wery high rate of fire with three-shots bursts - ca. 2000 rounds per minute. Also, this results in that the actual recoil affects the rifle AFTER the last bullet in the burst is fired."
So if they modified it a bit so that Full-auto could work like 3 round burst... that would be insane... and the fact that the recoil affected the rifle AFTER... that's crazy... you could use 3 round burst and the grouping would be awesome...
"The cartridge propelled the bullet that weights 3.25 gramms, to the 930-960 meters per second." M16A1: 945m/s (650-750 rounds per minute) M16A2: 975m/s (800 rounds per minute [only 3 round burst])
So the G11 of friggin awesome... oh, and it had a 45-50round magazine, and the gun held 3 (one active, 2 reserve). I don't know how it stacks up to the G36 but it was lighter and at least 50% more accurate then the giant G3s. Ugh, so much down the drain...
sorry... sorry... i am just kind ofbored, i broke my radiator and now im testing it, running the system with out the computer on... i think i will shower and if it still hasn't leaked ill set every thing back up... Worst case scenario is I have to buy a new radiator but this time I'll get a 1x120mm with a shroud on it that comes with mounting stuff so I don't have to worry as much.
oh, and i went to a party last night and lived, but seriously, i hate it when parents let their kids throw these parties where they know 100% there are drugs and alcohol... i suppose if I had kids who were going to do those things id preffer they do it at home where it would be safer and they wouldnt end up in prison, but if i caught my kids doing that Id scare them to the point where they would be too busy liviing their life because they were too afraid i was gonna kill them to waste it high or drunk... ... a bit of an exageration of course but I don't think I would want my kids doing any of that (no offense to any one who does, but wouldn't you agree that if you had kids you'd preffer them not doing it and being safe and all that if you could choose?)
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
neonex) wrote,
Holy Crap
